<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Kay Tastrophe's Military School]]></title>
		<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Kay Tastrophe's Military School -- A complete education for Kay's finest women and men.]]></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 19:53:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>ebooks</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10725&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:44:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Right, one has a Kindle :D Now for books. I don't know what it's like in the US, but in the UK, second-hand paperbacks are usually cheaper than the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Right, one has a Kindle :D Now for books. I don't know what it's like in the US, but in the UK, second-hand paperbacks are usually cheaper than the Kindle version and very readily available, though it's good to buy some to take on holiday. I have been looking at free Kindle books and downloaded a few from Amazon, by going to the top 100 books, which included the top 100 free. I am also familiar with Project Gutenberg. Are there any other trustworthy places to get more modern free ebooks?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=6">Media</category>
			<dc:creator>Cat of Ulthar</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10725</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>May 20 solar eclipse</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10724&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Check out this map: 
 
Image: http://en.es-static.us/upl/2012/05/annular_eclipse_map.jpg  
 
Look what city is right smack dab in the middle of the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Check out this map:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://en.es-static.us/upl/2012/05/annular_eclipse_map.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Look what city is right smack dab in the middle of the eclipse path!<br />
<br />
This is going to be an awesome Sunday. :D<br />
<br />
All I need to do is get some eclipse glasses, or welding glass, so we can look at it. :)</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=20">All Purpose</category>
			<dc:creator>Name Lips</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10724</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paper monster minis</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10723&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:52:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[As I joined the order of the stick kickstarter, I got the "Monster for every season" pack, four wonderful sets of over 250 printable miniatures drawn...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>As I joined the order of the stick kickstarter, I got the &quot;Monster for every season&quot; pack, four wonderful sets of over 250 printable miniatures drawn by Rich Burlew. I just got the spring edition; they are really cool but I am unlikely to ever need them for a game and they are too great not to be used. Anyone interested? They're printable PDFs, I'll mail them to you.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=14">Gaming</category>
			<dc:creator>Cat of Ulthar</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10723</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>twitter-based Iambic Pentametron</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10722&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 02:10:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Some fellow built a program to search through random tweets and find the ones that happen to be written in iambic pentameter. It then finds ones that...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Some fellow built a program to search through random tweets and find the ones that happen to be written in iambic pentameter. It then finds ones that rhyme, and assembles them into sonnets.<br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Spurs are the definition of a &quot;Team&quot;..<br />
there's nothing more important than a dream<br />
<br />
i'm never gonna sleep tonight okay.<br />
i hope tomorrow be a better day .<br />
<br />
You really are the lowest of the low.<br />
In highland city headed to the tow<br />
<br />
I'm still procrastinating my essay.<br />
I drew a little drawing class today:)<br />
<br />
I really want another burger tho<br />
does Cheryl Miller have a mini fro?<br />
<br />
the darkest night precedes the brightest light<br />
What's is the move in lawrenceville tonight ??<br />
<br />
So many people's birthdays are in May<br />
I've gotten very little texts today..
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div>I hear there are fun NWS ones in there, but haven't found any yet.<br />
<br />
<br />
Check it out!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/redirector.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpentametron.com%2F" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://pentametron.com/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=20">All Purpose</category>
			<dc:creator>Name Lips</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10722</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What kind of win might this be?</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10721&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>After an emotionally draining day that involved explaining to my 8 year old that sometimes being a mom entails using discipline to teach lessons and...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>After an emotionally draining day that involved explaining to my 8 year old that sometimes being a mom entails using discipline to teach lessons and isn't always waffles and puppies, I got the following from him as he put away dishes: &quot;I don't think I would ever make a good parent.&quot; &quot;Why is that?&quot; &quot;I don't think I could ever be as mean as you.&quot;<br />
<br />
I'm not sure if that is EPIC FUCKING WIN or if it's EPIC FUCKING MEGA AWESOME WIN. Pretty sure it's a win of some sort. I deserve an award to put on my wall next to the cotton ball ice cream cone artwork.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=20">All Purpose</category>
			<dc:creator>Atropine Mama</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dentist bill nightmare</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10720&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>So about 18 months ago, I had a horrible experience with my dentist so I decided to change dentists.  Last summer, I started having tooth pain.  I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>So about 18 months ago, I had a horrible experience with my dentist so I decided to change dentists.  Last summer, I started having tooth pain.  I went to a new dentist, Dr. R, and told him that I was really strapped at the moment so I didn't want anything done that wasn't covered by my insurance.  I wanted him to tell me what I needed to have done and what it would cost before I agreed to anything.  He promised me everything would be okay, and he said I needed 3 fillings at a cost of $150.  <br />
<br />
I scrounged up the money and made an appointment.  My appointment got rescheduled twice because he had a stroke.  I was really uneasy when I finally got scheduled but just wanted it over with and my pain to end.  He only had use of one arm.  His assistant had to do an awful lot of the work and it was completely nerve wracking.  He did one filling.  Then another filling.  Then he started on the third.  After what seemed like an eternity he declared that it needed a root canal and a crown which would cost $800 and that I now had a temporary filling so I would need to get the work done within 6 weeks.  <br />
<br />
WTF?  I didn't have $800 and there was no way I could get it in 6 weeks.  When I went up to the front desk, they charged me $254.  What?  I only brought $150.  By this point I am crying and I am numb and unable to really speak.  I burn $100 of my food budget for the month just to get the hell out of there.  And it takes me days to come to grips with what happened.  I just got charged extra to have work done, I did not okay.  And now I have 6 weeks to figure out how to get the rest done.  I swear I will never set foot in that establishment again.  <br />
<br />
I get a medical care card, and go to a root canal specialist and get the root canal done on credit.  I then go to a different dentist to get an estimate on the crown and because my tooth pain has not gone away.  She says that before I even think about a crown, I have 7 other cavities that he did not fix, including the one that is causing me the pain.  So I start having to have all this other work done, and I eventually get the crown and am now facing another root canal on the original tooth that was causing me pain that he did not fix and...  <br />
<br />
Today I get a letter in the mail that Dr. R has sent a $150 bill to collections.  I call and get the secretary who says she did not work for him last summer so she has no idea what happened to me but once a bill has been sent to collections she has no control over it any more, has no idea what I am being billed for, and that I need to call the collections agency if I want to fight it.  <br />
<br />
What the hell do I do now?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=20">All Purpose</category>
			<dc:creator>emerald</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10720</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Crafting a low magic campaign in 3.5</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10719&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:07:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[At this point, I'm fairly entrenched in my D&D group (and all the drama that comes with it) and my turn to DM will be coming up in a few months. The...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>At this point, I'm fairly entrenched in my D&amp;D group (and all the drama that comes with it) and my turn to DM will be coming up in a few months. The DM of my last game had to take a break as his wife has surgery and the new, current DM will need a break coming up in August. Odds are, I'll be asked to DM next since I'm the only other one to express interest.<br />
<br />
For a long time, I've been wanting to do a more low magic oriented campaign. To tackle one question early on: Yes, I want to use 3.5. The group itself is in a fairly interesting predicament right now and the last thing I want to do is try and introduce a new system and all that.<br />
<br />
After tossing this around for a couple of weeks I finally started some preliminary work last night. I called Radu and chatted at him for a bit to bounce some initial ideas that I think are simply cool.<br />
<br />
For a base, I think I'm using a more or less &quot;fallen world&quot; idea where a cataclysmic event led to destruction on a global scale. At the time of the campaign, the world has finally started to structure itself back into civilizations and the Gods themselves are a bit leery at the prospect that magic could once again become a large, prevalent force.<br />
<br />
At the start of the campaign I'm strongly considering having them be lower ranking members of a religious order on the outskirts of civilization defending against pagan, uncivilized neighbors. I like the idea of it being a cold, unforgiving part of the world heavily based around Baltic history as well. In fact, I may just end up using a hierarchy much similar to the Teutonic Order for the organization the players are a part of.<br />
<br />
So, what I'm wanting to accomplish is a few things. The first is that magical items are indeed incredibly rare. Of course, thing throws off D&amp;D economy and the CR system but those are fixable with a little work and foresight. Honestly, I don't see CR being a big deal as a big chunk of the early campaign will be normal humanoids fighting normal humanoids with very similar, non-magic equipment. Should be fairly easy to get that balanced out.<br />
<br />
Now, that can get stagnant and boring after awhile. One thing I'm looking at to help make interesting encounters is including bad guys built in Pathfinder. No one at my gaming table is interested nor has really looked into Pathfinder at all so I think I'm fairly lucky in a way. That gives me a solid mechanical base to create a tough bad guy inside a similar rule set and throw instances and mechanics at the players they will be completely unaccustomed to. Yes, in general Pathfinder PCs are stronger, but in a way I'm counting on that. I like the idea of sects of these religious pagans being led by Oracles, for example. The party will likely initially think Oracle is merely a title given but once combat starts and they see new abilities they don't understand that can completely change the dynamic of fighting and it's approach entirely.<br />
<br />
Magic item creation I'm still stuck on with how to limit and it not feel like some artificial limit imposed justified by a &quot;because I said so&quot; from the DM.<br />
<br />
I think one interesting yet possibly tedious solution to magic casting is the strict adherence to spell components for all casters. Yes, magic exists, but in a way it is a very finite resource. Scrounging for materials will be a constant drive in a lot of ways. Of course, in one email to a friend I mentioned that does create a good reason to just run in, beat up a bunch of pagans, and take their stuff.<br />
<br />
To help smooth things out I'm also looking around for an armor DR system I like. On top of that, I'm looking at honorary levels granted at certain character intervals to help give a player boost that isn't based around magical gear. Say, at levels 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 they are granted a new &quot;rank&quot; inside this religious order. Each rank gives an extra hit dice, saves, and skills like a normal class progression would, except that it doesn't in any way count towards standard progression. It's simply a bonus tacked on and to help enforce the D&amp;D standard that indeed the PCs are still &quot;special&quot; in some way.<br />
<br />
I'm also strongly looking at tweaking the Craft skills. Since I like the idea of the campaign taking place over a longer period of time it adds the potential for characters to be more in charge of their own gearing since they may have several days, or weeks, of downtime back at camp in between missions.<br />
<br />
So far, I think I've got an alright base set up but I'm still in the early idea mining phase. I really think an idea like this is just awesome in so many ways because once the party is able to explore even farther outside of their known civilization is when I can start bringing in more interesting elements. Trudging around in a 1,000 year old ruin is suddenly a lot more dangerous when you have extremely limited supplies and absolutely zero idea of what to expect.<br />
<br />
Also, for fun and flavor, I'm thinking of introducing Orcs fairly late. I really like them being the foreign threat from the East in glorious Mongol fashion and should end up being a serious threat to the party. Of course, they're led by Cavaliers from Pathfinder as well so that too will completely change how the party adjusts to various combat styles and settings. Also, since Orcs are fairly new, there's no way any one would at all know the Orcish language. So, &quot;first contact&quot; with them would definitely be interesting.<br />
<br />
Any thoughts or concerns are definitely appreciated. I don't have anything set in stone just yet but I am confident I can make something work. My goal with this is to make a completely justifiable world and system in place that makes sense. Again, relying on the &quot;because the DM said so&quot; as a justification for why things do or don't exist is a bad way of handling things if you ask me.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=14">Gaming</category>
			<dc:creator>Critter</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10719</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Coming Attractions</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10716&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 16:26:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>This is a thread to discuss movies you have not yet seen, based on the trailers you see when you are in the theater to see something else. 
 
What is...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This is a thread to discuss movies you have not yet seen, based on the trailers you see when you are in the theater to see something else.<br />
<br />
What is your impression of the film based on the trailer and would you see it?<br />
<br />
I'll start.<br />
Went to see Dark Shadows yesterday and saw trailers for a number of films.  This was an IMAX theatre.  <br />
<br />
Prometheus:  <br />
<br />
I adore Ridley Scott and like the Alien series, and I'm pretty intrigued by this idea of a prequel.  But there is no way I'm going to see this in IMAX.  I'm sure I'd need therapy afterwards and probably sedation beforehand.  The volume and the movement was overwhelming in the short burst I saw.  But the clarity of the images was doubly intense.  Whoa.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=6">Media</category>
			<dc:creator>shiningbrow</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10716</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>More Artwork</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10715&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 15:02:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>A friend of mine has a homebrew world that he writes stories for and has published a few of them through the same publisher as me. His readers...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>A friend of mine has a homebrew world that he writes stories for and has published a few of them through the same publisher as me. His readers weren't getting that they were from the same world so I offered to make him a logo. This is the one he liked:<br />
 <br />
<img src="http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2012/132/5/e/logo__take_two_by_kastil-d4zj8aj.png" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=9">Art</category>
			<dc:creator>Kastil</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10715</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Recipe of the day</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10713&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:28:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I signed up for Brookshire's (grocery store) recipe of the day, normally I wouldn't post it but god this sounds good. I apologize if you're on a diet...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I signed up for Brookshire's (grocery store) recipe of the day, normally I wouldn't post it but god this sounds good. I apologize if you're on a diet<br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Cheesecake Tart with Popcorn Crust and Berries<br />
<br />
    * Directions<br />
<br />
Servings:Makes 8 servings.<br />
Preparation Time: 20 minutes<br />
Cook Time: 20 minutes<br />
A whimsical crust for a no bake mascarpone cheesecake is prepared with ground popped popcorn, sugar and floral Herbes de Provence. The tart is serve with lightly cooked sweetened berries.<br />
Ingredients<br />
<br />
Popcorn Crust:<br />
<br />
3 cups unsalted popped popcorn<br />
<br />
1/3 cup sugar<br />
<br />
6 Tbs butter, melted<br />
<br />
2 tsp McCormick® Gourmet Collection Herbes de Provence<br />
<br />
Cheesecake Tart with Berries:<br />
<br />
1 package (8 ounces) cream cheese, softened<br />
<br />
1 cup mascarpone cheese<br />
<br />
1 1/2 Tbs honey<br />
<br />
1/4 cup sugar<br />
<br />
1 Tbs cornstarch<br />
<br />
1 tsp McCormick® Gourmet Collection Herbes de Provence<br />
<br />
1/3 cup water<br />
<br />
1 tsp lemon juice<br />
<br />
1 cup blueberries<br />
<br />
2 cups mixed berries, such as blackberries, raspberries and strawberries<br />
<br />
Directions<br />
<br />
Preheat oven to 350°F. For the Crust, place popcorn, about 1 cup at a time, in bowl of food processor or blender; cover. Process until finely ground. Mix ground popcorn, 1/3 cup sugar, butter and 2 teaspoons Herbes de Provence in medium bowl until well blended. Press mixture firmly onto bottom of foil-lined 9-inch tart pan. Bake 8 to 10 minutes or until lightly browned. Cool completely on wire rack.<br />
<br />
For the Tart, mix cream cheese, mascarpone cheese and honey in medium bowl with electric mixer on medium speed until well blended. Spread evenly in prepared crust. Refrigerate at least 2 hours or until ready to serve.<br />
<br />
Mix 1/4 cup sugar, cornstarch and 1 teaspoon Herbes de Provence in medium saucepan. Stir in water and lemon juice until well blended. Stir in blueberries. Stirring constantly, bring to boil on medium heat and boil 1 minute. Pour into medium bowl to cool slightly. Add remaining berries; toss gently to coat well. Refrigerate until ready to serve. Remove tart from foil-lined pan. Cut into slices to serve. Top with berry mixture
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=9">Art</category>
			<dc:creator>doc</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10713</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>12% of moms use cellphones during sex</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10711&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 01:47:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://digitallife.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/10/11638801-12-percent-of-younger-moms-use-cellphone-during-sex-study 
 
I'd quote the article,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/redirector.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigitallife.today.msnbc.msn.com%2F_news%2F2012%2F05%2F10%2F11638801-12-percent-of-younger-moms-use-cellphone-during-sex-study" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://digitallife.today.msnbc.msn.c...ring-sex-study</a><br />
<br />
I'd quote the article, but really the headline says it all. It has no anecdotal statements as to how or why they use cellphones -- just a survey that says that this is, in fact, the case.<br />
<br />
So, of course, the mind is allowed to wander freely. :D Are their partners aware, or are they texting on the sly? Are the women answering it mid-act? Is the phone an active participant -- on vibrate mode perhaps? <br />
<br />
Fess up ladies, why do you do it?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=5">Sex</category>
			<dc:creator>Name Lips</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10711</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Obama supports gay marriage</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10710&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 01:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/09/11621156-obama-i-think-same-sex-couples-should-be-able-to-get-married?lite 
 
 
---Quote--- 
Obama:...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/redirector.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffirstread.msnbc.msn.com%2F_news%2F2012%2F05%2F09%2F11621156-obama-i-think-same-sex-couples-should-be-able-to-get-married%3Flite" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news...t-married?lite</a><br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Obama: 'I think same-sex couples should be able to get married'<br />
<br />
Updated 4:50 p.m. ET- President Barack Obama endorsed the right of same-sex couples to marry on Wednesday, a landmark pronouncement made in light of mounting pressure from gay rights advocates.<br />
<br />
Obama became the first U.S. president to back the right of gay and lesbian couples to marry, a reversal from views expressed during the 2008 campaign, when he said he opposed same-sex marriage but favored civil unions as an alternative.<br />
<br />
Obama told ABC News that, after reflection, he had &quot;concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married.&quot;<br />
<br />
In making his announcement, Obama completes what he had described as an “evolution” in his views on this issue, hastened by growing fervor this week involving gay rights. The growing pressure was capped Tuesday by North Carolina voters’ approval of a constitutional amendment banning not only same-sex marriages, but civil unions for gay and lesbian couples, as well.<br />
<br />
Obama’s shift not only speaks to a broad swath of the electorate, which has exhibited increasing acceptance of same-sex marriage in opinion polls, but also gay and lesbian voters who compose a core part of Obama’s base, and have been major fundraisers for his re-election.<br />
<br />
Obama explained that he had hesitated in fully supporting same-sex marriage because he thought civil unions would be sufficient.<br />
<br />
&quot;I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married,&quot; he told ABC.<br />
<br />
The president had found himself under increasing pressure this week to state his position unequivocally after Vice President Joe Biden voiced support for same-sex marriage.<br />
<br />
&quot;I am absolutely comfortable with the fact that men marrying men, women marrying women, and heterosexual men and women marrying another are entitled to the same exact rights, all the civil rights, all the civil liberties,&quot; Biden said on NBC’s &quot;Meet the Press.&quot; &quot;And quite frankly, I don't see much of a distinction beyond that.&quot;<br />
<br />
While the White House emphasized that Biden’s position wasn’t representative of the entire administration, Education Secretary Arne Duncan’s pronouncement Monday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” in support of same-sex marriage added to pressure on the president.<br />
<br />
“I have no update on the president's personal views,” press secretary Jay Carney said repeatedly at Monday’s White House press briefing in reference to the president’s self-styled “evolution” on gay marriage.<br />
<br />
As a result, Obama has risked fallout among his political base. The Washington Post reported this week that gay and liberal donors had threatened to withhold financial support for the president or a super PAC due to his refusal to sign an executive order barring discrimination of gays and lesbians in federal contracting.<br />
<br />
And Obama was expected, too, to encounter frustration at a major Hollywood fundraiser this week at the home of actor George Clooney.<br />
<br />
The overwhelming approval, too, of the measure, which Obama had opposed, in North Carolina -- a key swing state -- heightened speculation that the president might address the issue.<br />
<br />
GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney re-iterated his opposition to both same-sex marriage and civil unions on Tuesday.<br />
<br />
&quot;I have the same view on marriage that I had when I was governor and that I've expressed many times,&quot; he said following the president's announcement. &quot;I believe marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman.&quot;<br />
<br />
Earlier, he told KDVR-TV in Denver: &quot;I do not favor marriage between people of the same gender, and I do not favor civil unions if they are identical to marriage other than by name ... My view is the domestic partnership benefits, hospital visitation rights, and the like are appropriate but that the others are not.&quot;<br />
<br />
Obama has faced tremendous pressure throughout his administration to advance gay rights.<br />
<br />
Among his earliest acts as president included signing an executive order extending benefits to federal employees in same-sex partnerships in 2009. Obama also ordered the government to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act -- the 1996 laws allowing states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages in other states -- in court.<br />
<br />
The administration’s crowning achievement on gay rights came more methodically, though -- sometimes to the frustration of advocates for same-sex rights.<br />
<br />
Obama signed the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” -- the military’s ban on openly gay or lesbian service members -- into law in December 2010. But the repeal came after months of legislative wrangling, and the president’s refusal to sign a simple order to make the change. And even after Obama signed the law, the implementation took months.<br />
<br />
Same-sex marriage is hardly the hot-button issue it was compared to the last decade, though. Support for it now eclipses opposition; 49 percent of Americans said that favor allowing gays and lesbians to marry, according to the March NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, while 40 percent oppose it. (In October 2009, 49 percent opposed same-sex marriages, while 41 percent supported them.)<br />
<br />
Opinion has shifted especially among independent voters, who back marriage rights 46 percent to 37 percent. About three in 10 Republicans said they, too, support same-sex marriage.<br />
<br />
However, of the 18 states making composing the “toss-up” or “lean” categories in NBC’s battleground map, 10 have banned same-sex marriage and civil unions outright, either by constitutional amendment or statute. Just two -- Iowa and New Hampshire -- have legalized gay marriage outright, while other states operate in more nebulous space when it comes to gay and lesbian couples.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=7">Politics</category>
			<dc:creator>Name Lips</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10710</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>music out of google translate</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10708&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Go to google translate.  Paste in the following text: 
 
 
---Quote--- 
pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk bschk pv bschk...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Go to google translate.  Paste in the following text:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk bschk pv bschk bschk pv kkkkkkkkkk bschk bschk bschk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk bschk pv bschk bschk pv kkkkkkkkkk bschk bschk bschk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk bschk pv bschk bschk pv kkkkkkkkkk bschk bschk bschk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk bschk pv bschk bschk pv kkkkkkkkkk bschk bschk bschk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk pv zk bschk pv zk pv bschk zk bschk pv bschk bschk pv kkkkkkkkkk bschk bschk bschk
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div>Choose &quot;german&quot; as from the &quot;from&quot; language.  Then click on the little loudspeaker to have an audio translation (on the german side, otherwise it won't work)<br />
<br />
:lol:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/redirector.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftranslate.google.com%2F%23de%7Cen%7Cpv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520pv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520kkkkkkkkkk%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520pv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520kkkkkkkkkk%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520pv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520kkkkkkkkkk%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520pv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520kkkkkkkkkk%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520pv%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520zk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520zk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520pv%2520kkkkkkkkkk%2520bschk%2520bschk%2520bschk" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/#de|en|p...0bschk%20bschk</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=6">Media</category>
			<dc:creator>Ancalagon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10708</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FBI ask businesses not to opposed backdoor snooping law</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10707&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 22:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[:grey: 
 
This is not only unethical, unnecessary (get a warrant!!!), it's also foolish.  Who else will gain access to this backdoor?  Foreign...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>:grey:<br />
<br />
This is not only unethical, unnecessary (get a warrant!!!), it's also foolish.  Who else will gain access to this backdoor?  Foreign industrial espionage, here we come!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/redirector.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.salon.com%2F2012%2F05%2F06%2Fsurveillance_state_democracy%2Fsingleton%2F%3Fmiaou" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.salon.com/2012/05/06/surv...ngleton/?miaou</a><br />
<br />
(formating is better on the site)<br />
<br />
CNET‘s excellent technology reporter, Declan McCullagh, reports on ongoing efforts by the Obama administration to force the Internet industry to provide the U.S. Government with “backdoor” access to all forms of Internet communication:<br />
<br />
    The FBI is asking Internet companies not to oppose a controversial proposal that would require firms, including Microsoft, Facebook, Yahoo, and Google, to build in backdoors for government surveillance. . . . That included a scheduled trip this month to the West Coast — which was subsequently postponed — to meet with Internet companies’ CEOs and top lawyers. . . .<br />
<br />
    The FBI general counsel’s office has drafted a proposed law that the bureau claims is the best solution: requiring that social-networking Web sites and providers of VoIP, instant messaging, and Web e-mail alter their code to ensure their products are wiretap-friendly.<br />
<br />
    “If you create a service, product, or app that allows a user to communicate, you get the privilege of adding that extra coding,” an industry representative who has reviewed the FBI’s draft legislation told CNET.<br />
<br />
As for the substance of this policy, I wrote about this back in September, 2010, when it first revealed that the Obama administration was preparing legislation to mandate that “all services that enable communications — including encrypted e-mail transmitters like BlackBerry, social networking Web sites like Facebook and software that allows direct ‘peer to peer’ messaging like Skype” — be designed to ensure government surveillance access. This isn’t about expanding the scope of the government’s legal surveillance powers — numerous legislative changes since 2001 have already accomplished that quite nicely — but is about ensuring the government’s physical ability to intrude into all forms of Internet communication.<br />
<br />
What was most amazing to me back when I first wrote about these Obama administration efforts was that a mere six weeks earlier, a major controversy had erupted when Saudi Arabia and the UAE both announced a ban on BlackBerries on the ground that they were physically unable to monitor the communications conducted on those devices. Since Blackberry communication data are sent directly to servers in Canada and the company which operates Blackberry — Research in Motion — refused to turn the data over to those governments, “authorities [in those two tyrannies] decided to ban Blackberry services rather than continue to allow an uncontrolled and unmonitored flow of electronic information within their borders.” As I wrote at the time: “that’s the core mindset of the Omnipotent Surveillance State: above all else, what is strictly prohibited is the ability of citizens to communicate in private; we can’t have any ‘uncontrolled and unmonitored flow of electronic information’.”<br />
<br />
In response to that controversy, the Obama administration actually condemned the Saudi and UAE ban, calling it “a dangerous precedent” and a threat to “democracy, human rights and freedom of information.” Yet six weeks later, the very same Obama administration embraced exactly the same rationale — that it is intolerable for any human interaction to take place beyond the prying eyes and ears of the government — when it proposed its mandatory “backdoor access” for all forms of Internet communication. Indeed, the UAE pointed out that the U.S. — as usual — was condemning exactly that which it itself was doing:<br />
<br />
    Yousef Al Otaiba, the UAE Ambassador to the United States, said [the Obama administration's] comments were disappointing and contradict the U.S. government’s own approach to telecommunication regulation.<br />
<br />
    “In fact, the UAE is exercising its sovereign right and is asking for exactly the same regulatory compliance — and with the same principles of judicial and regulatory oversight — that Blackberry grants the U.S. and other governments and nothing more,” Otaiba said.<br />
<br />
    “Importantly, the UAE requires the same compliance as the U.S. for the very same reasons: to protect national security and to assist in law enforcement.”<br />
<br />
A week after the announced ban by the Saudis and UAE, The New York Times published an Op-Ed by Richard Falkenrath — a top-level Homeland Security official in the Bush administration and current principal in the private firm of former Bush DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff — expressing support for the UAE’s Blackberry ban. Falkenrath explained that “[a]mong law enforcement investigators and intelligence officers [in the U.S.], the Emirates’ decision met with approval, admiration and perhaps even a touch of envy.” The Obama administration — by essentially seeking to ban any Internet technology that allows communication to take place beyond its reach — is working hard to ensure that its own Surveillance State apparatus keeps up with those of the UAE and Saudi Arabia.<br />
<br />
The FBI claims this requirement is merely an extension of current law that mandates that all telecommunications carriers provide government surveillance access to telephone conversations when a search warrant is obtained, and that failure to extend this requirement to Internet communications will risk “Going Dark” with important investigations. There are many reasons why this claim is false.<br />
<br />
For one, as surveillance expert Julian Sanchez explained to me in October, the U.S. Government does not need “backdoor” access to all Interent communications in order to surveil even individuals using encrypted communications; instead they can simply obtain end-user surveillance to do so: “if the FBI has an individual target and fear he’ll use encryption, they can do a covert entry under a traditional search warrant and install a keylogger on his computer.” Moreover, the problem cited by the FBI to justify this new power is a total pretext: “investigators encountered encrypted communications only one time during 2009&#8242;s wiretaps” and, even then, “the state investigators told the court that the encryption did not prevent them from getting the plain text of the messages.” As usual, fear-mongering over national security and other threats is the instrument to justify massive new surveillance powers that will extend far beyond their claimed function.<br />
<br />
Sanchez explains that the true value of requiring back-door access for all Internet communications is full-scale access to all communications: “If you want to sift through communications in bulk, it’s only going to be feasible with a systemic backdoor.” McCullagh notes that Joe Biden has been unsuccessfully attempting to ban encrypted communications, or at least require full-scale government access, since well before 9/11. As for why this proposed bill is far more intrusive and dangerous than current law requiring all telephone communications to be subject to government surveillance, see Sanchez’s analysis here. The ACLU makes similar points here about why this proposal is so dangerous, and describes the numerous ways it extends far beyond current authorities concerning government access to telephone communications.<br />
<br />
Moreover, for anyone who defends the Obama administration here and insists that the U.S. Government simply must have access to all forms of human communication: does that also apply to in-person communication? Should home and apartment builders be required to install monitors in every room they build to ensure that the Government can surveil all human communications in order to prevent threats to national security and public safety? I believe someone once wrote a book about where this mindset inevitably leads. The very idea that no human communication should ever be allowed to take place beyond the reach of the Government is definitive authoritarianism, which is why Saudi Arabia and the UAE — and their American patron-ally — have so vigorously embraced it.<br />
<br />
* * * * *<br />
<br />
The procedure being used here by the FBI to obtain these powers is just as significant to me as the substance of the policy it wants. Notice how the FBI — in order to obtain these new powers — does not believe it needs to persuade the American citizenry to accept it. Instead, they’re meeting with the people who actually hold power over our laws — industry executives — in order to plead with them not to oppose this. FBI officials even planned a pilgrimage to Silicon Valley “to meet with Internet companies’ CEOs and top lawyers” in the hope of obtaining their permission to proceed with this new scheme.<br />
<br />
This, of course, is how virtually all American laws are written: by having government officials meet in secret with affected industries to ensure that their interests (as opposed to the interests of ordinary citizens) are protected. This is what the recent (and probably temporary) defeat of SOPA revealed: although it was genuinely encouraging to see so many people from all different realms voice objections to the government’s attempted seizure of Internet-control powers, it was really the fact that the Interent industry opposed the law that doomed it. Citizen opposition, by itself, would never have been sufficient to overcome the pro-SOPA lobbying of the entertainment industry; it took a different powerful industry to stop it. For that reason, remaining remnants of Internet privacy depend upon the willingness of the tech industry to defend them, and while some companies have been commendable in those efforts, it’s far from clear that industry opposition to increased surveillance powers has anything to do with privacy concerns:<br />
<br />
    If there is going to be a CALEA rewrite, “industry would like to see any new legislation include some protections against disclosure of any trade secrets or other confidential information that might be shared with law enforcement, so that they are not released, for example, during open court proceedings,” says Roszel Thomsen, a partner at Thomsen and Burke who represents technology companies and is a member of an FBI study group. He suggests that such language would make it “somewhat easier” for both industry and the police to respond to new technologies.<br />
<br />
There are potentially promising options for at least limiting, if not reversing, this sprawling Surveillance State. The SOPA fight proved that there is a vibrant constituency among Internet users for fighting government control of the Internet, but the key is to ensure that it remains a trans-partisan cause. There are examples demonstrating that restricting government power can transcend standard ideological divides — Adam Serwer reported last week on the left-right coalition that has arisen against the NDAA’s indefinite detention provisions, and we’ve seen similar coalitions in opposition to the Patriot Act and endless militarism, and in support of transparency for the Fed and in defense of civil liberties and privacy in Britain. Indeed, opposing the Clinton administration’s attempt in the 1990s to ban government-proof encryption was once a major cause for self-styled “limited government” conservatives as well as civil liberties groups.<br />
<br />
These examples prove that it is possible to mobilize meaningful citizen opposition to growing government surviellance powers if these standard partisan and ideological divdes are overcome. Along those lines, McCullagh notes that “the White House, perhaps less inclined than the bureau to initiate what would likely be a bruising privacy battle, has not sent the FBI’s [] amendments to Capitol Hill, even though they were expected last year.”<br />
<br />
There’s also the possibility — as dangerous as it is promising — that severe economic anxieties could lead large numbers of people to abandon the two-party mainstream and its orthodoxies; that is precisely what is happening now in Greece. Growing discontent with America’s political institutions could scramble and subvert now-unchallenged precepts in all sorts of unpredictable ways, both good and bad (indeed, it seems clear that fear of that sort of unrest is a major factor motivating always-increasing domestic Surveillance State powers).<br />
<br />
It is possible for citizens to meaningfully oppose this relentless expansion of the Surveillance State. These ongoing efforts by the Obama administration to ensure full government access to all forms of communication reflect that such efforts are desperately needed. But at least thus far, those who continue to expand the National Security and Surveillance State appear to have little fear of any meaningful citizen backlash.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=7">Politics</category>
			<dc:creator>Ancalagon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10707</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Avengers spoiler</title>
			<link>http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10706&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:25:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Attachment 18251 (http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/attachment.php?attachmentid=18251)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/attachment.php?attachmentid=18251" target="_blank">Attachment 18251</a></div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/images/attach/png.gif" alt="File Type: png" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/attachment.php?attachmentid=18251&amp;d=1336497917">spoiler.png</a> (177.2 KB)</td>
</tr>

			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=6">Media</category>
			<dc:creator>Caliphis</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kaytastrophe.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10706</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

