PDA

View Full Version : Greenspan Book Criticizes Bush And Republicans


Varaj
09-15-2007, 10:51 AM
In a withering critique of his fellow Republicans, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan says in his memoir that the party to which he has belonged all his life deserved to lose power last year for forsaking its small-government principles.

In "The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World," published by Penguin Press, Mr. Greenspan criticizes both congressional Republicans and President George W. Bush for abandoning fiscal discipline.

The book is scheduled for public release Monday. The Wall Street Journal bought a copy at a bookstore in the New York area.

Mr. Greenspan, who calls himself a "lifelong libertarian Republican," writes that he advised the White House to veto some bills to curb "out-of-control" spending while the Republicans controlled Congress. He says President Bush's failure to do so "was a major mistake." Republicans in Congress, he writes, "swapped principle for power. They ended up with neither. They deserved to lose."

Many economists say the Fed, by cutting short-term interest rates to 1% in mid-2003 and keeping them there for a year, helped foster a housing bubble that is now bursting. In his book, which was largely written before much of the recent turmoil in credit markets, Mr. Greenspan defends the policy. "We wanted to shut down the possibility of corrosive deflation," he writes. "We were willing to chance that by cutting rates we might foster a bubble, an inflationary boom of some sort, which we would subsequently have to address....It was a decision done right."

He attributes the housing boom to the end of communism, which he says unleashed hundreds of millions of workers on global markets, putting downward pressure on wages and prices, and thus on long-term interest rates.

Mr. Greenspan retired in early 2006 after 18 years as chairman of the Federal Reserve. He had served under six presidents as either Fed chairman or adviser. He now runs a private consulting company; his only formal public role is adviser to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

Penguin paid an advance of more than $8 million last year for Mr. Greenspan's book, according to people familiar with the matter. Promotion for the book includes appearances by Mr. Greenspan on CBS's "60 Minutes," NBC's "Today" and CNBC, interviews with foreign and U.S. media, book signings and speaking engagements. The book's official release comes a day before the most-watched Fed meeting of the year. On Tuesday, Mr. Greenspan's successor, Ben Bernanke, must decide whether to cut interest rates to cushion the economy from the reversal of the housing boom that began under Mr. Greenspan's watch.

His book is half memoir and half treatise on the state of the world and its future. While much of the ground has been covered either in his own previous public remarks or in other books, Mr. Greenspan sheds new light on many policy decisions, offers often-trenchant observations of the presidents he has known and makes some surprising economic forecasts, unmuffled by the often opaque and complex phraseology he used as Fed chairman. Critics, however, may seize on his continued defense of decisions they say led to first a stock bubble and then a housing bubble, and on some assertions that differ from the historical record.

Mr. Greenspan writes that when President Bush chose Dick Cheney as vice president and Paul O'Neill as treasury secretary -- both colleagues from the Gerald Ford administration, during which Mr. Greenspan was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers -- he "indulged in a bit of fantasy" that this would be the government that would have resulted if Mr. Ford hadn't lost to Jimmy Carter in 1976. But Mr. Greenspan discovered that in the Bush White House, the "political operation was far more dominant" than in Mr. Ford's. "Little value was placed on rigorous economic policy debate or the weighing of long-term consequences," he writes.

From serving under so many presidents, Mr. Greenspan concludes that there's something abnormal about anyone willing to do what it takes to get the job. Mr. Ford, he writes, "was as close to normal as you get in a president, but he was never elected." The Watergate tapes, he says, show Richard Nixon as "an extremely smart man who is sadly paranoid, misanthropic and cynical." He recalls telling someone who had accused Nixon of anti-Semitism that he "wasn't exclusively anti-Semitic. He was anti-Semitic, anti-Italian, anti-Greek, anti-Slovak. I don't know anybody he was pro."

Ronald Reagan's ability to instantly tap one-liners and anecdotes in support of a particular policy represented an "odd form of intelligence." He describes Bill Clinton as "a fellow information hound" with "a consistent, disciplined focus on long-term economic growth" whose relationship with Monica Lewinsky "made me feel disappointed and sad."

Mr. Greenspan makes no mention of his successor as Fed chairman, Mr. Bernanke, other than in a caption accompanying a picture: "I was very comfortable leaving the post in the hands of such an experienced successor," it reads.

He devotes chapters to each of the major economic challenges facing the U.S. and the world. On energy, he recommends more use of nuclear power, and he predicts efforts to reduce global warming with carbon caps or taxes will fail. Rising income inequality could undo "the cultural ties that bind our society" and even lead to "large-scale violence." The remedy, he says, is not higher taxes on the rich but improved education, which can be helped by paying math teachers more.

Mr. Greenspan returns repeatedly to the far-reaching importance of communism's collapse. He says it discredited central planning throughout the world and inspired China and later India to throw off socialist policies. He recalls meeting a former manager of a produce distribution center in China who says he once had to labor to allocate produce according to government edict; now the allocations are made by auction. "Now I don't have to get up at four a.m.," he quotes the manager as saying. "I can sleep in and let the market do my job for me." Mr. Greenspan recalls his amazement when an adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin asks him to discuss Ayn Rand, the libertarian philosopher with whom Mr. Greenspan had been friends.

In coming years, as the globalization process winds down, he predicts inflation will become harder to contain. Recent increases in the price of imports from China and a rise in long-term interest rates suggest "the turn may be upon us sooner rather than later."

Left alone, he said, the Fed's policy-making body, the Federal Open Market Committee, can keep inflation between 1% and 2%, but that could require forcing interest rates to double-digits, a level "not seen since the days of Paul Volcker," his predecessor as Fed chairman. "I fear that my successors on the FOMC, as they strive to maintain price stability in the coming quarter century, will run into populist resistance from Congress, if not from the White House," he writes.

If the Fed succumbs to that pressure, inflation could rise from a little over 2% at present to an average of 4% to 5% by the year 2030, he writes. Ten-year Treasury yields, now below 5%, will rise to "at least 8%" with the potential to go "significantly higher for brief periods." This, he says, will lead to stagnant returns on stocks and bonds and much smaller gains in housing prices.

Mr. Greenspan won plaudits for achieving low inflation and unemployment with just two mild recessions during his tenure at the Fed. But more recently his record has taken some knocks. Some critics fault him for not doing more to restrain the stock bubble of the 1990s, and for responding to its eventual bursting with such low interest rates that housing prices subsequently soared.

Mr. Greenspan writes that in early 1997, he told his colleagues the Fed should raise interest rates as a "preemptive" move against a stock-market bubble. But transcripts of Fed meetings from that period do not support his book's version of events: They show Mr. Greenspan argued for a rate increase principally because of inflation.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118978549183327730.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Ouch.

TiQuinn
09-15-2007, 03:45 PM
Greenspan played the part of the good soldier when the decisions were made to pass the tax cuts, and I don't believe he was so naive to think that spending would be curtailed. I don't give much credit to people who make their opinions known after they've left power.

Varaj
09-15-2007, 04:04 PM
Greenspan played the part of the good soldier when the decisions were made to pass the tax cuts, and I don't believe he was so naive to think that spending would be curtailed. I don't give much credit to people who make their opinions known after they've left power.

I seem to recall Greenspan giving some pretty scathing commentary at the time as well.

Northcott
09-15-2007, 04:24 PM
Greenspan's an interesting figure. Many praised him as some kind of guru or quasi-mystic in regards to America's financial state, and praised him endlessly for his last run in the top dog position. But there were a few in financial circles that shook their heads, pointed out the possible long-term consequences of what was being done, and pretty much foretold exactly what's happening now.

I think that Greenspan may have fallen victim to the curse of believing his own hype. Not to the point of grotesquely egomaniacal behaviour; just enough to cause him to hold on to certain opinions longer than he should have. Millions may well end up paying the price for that.

Regardless, he's an intelligent man given to thorough use of that intelligence, and there's no doubting the primacy of his place in the world's economy over the years. I hope I have time (and remember) to read this book a little later in the year.

Ancalagon
09-15-2007, 10:51 PM
Greenspan's an interesting figure. Many praised him as some kind of guru or quasi-mystic in regards to America's financial state, and praised him endlessly for his last run in the top dog position. But there were a few in financial circles that shook their heads, pointed out the possible long-term consequences of what was being done, and pretty much foretold exactly what's happening now.

I think that Greenspan may have fallen victim to the curse of believing his own hype. Not to the point of grotesquely egomaniacal behaviour; just enough to cause him to hold on to certain opinions longer than he should have. Millions may well end up paying the price for that.

Regardless, he's an intelligent man given to thorough use of that intelligence, and there's no doubting the primacy of his place in the world's economy over the years. I hope I have time (and remember) to read this book a little later in the year.

He definitely could have done better, but he could have done MUCH worse too. I think overall history will have a positive look on him.

Northcott
09-15-2007, 11:37 PM
He definitely could have done better, but he could have done MUCH worse too. I think overall history will have a positive look on him.

Given the faith he was accorded and the amount of time he spent in a position of great power due to that faith, I can't say as I'm sure about any of the above. If it should turn out that the financial bubbles that rose on his watch cause long-term and/or broad-based suffering, chances are history won't be so kind.

TiQuinn
09-16-2007, 02:19 PM
I think this comment from Greenspan might be even more damning:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070916/pl_nm/usa_iraq_gates_dc_1;_ylt=AqHXbGWnG8CoUcIJdzurH98E1 vAI

Greenspan, in his new book, "The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World," echoed long-held complaints of many critics that a key motivating force in the war is to maintain U.S. access to the rich oil supplies in Iraq.

"Whatever their publicized angst over Saddam Hussein's 'weapons of mass destruction,' American and British authorities were also concerned about violence in an area that harbors a resource indispensable for the functioning of the world economy," Greenspan wrote.

"I'm saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: The Iraq war is largely about oil," added Greenspan, who for decades had been one of the most respected U.S. voices on fiscal policies.


The Administration has done a pretty good job of deflecting this point for the most part, effectively branding those who make the argument as a left wing nutjobs. Coming from Greenspan, it probably stings more.

Freedom Canadian
09-16-2007, 02:23 PM
If it should turn out that the financial bubbles that rose on his watch cause long-term and/or broad-based suffering, chances are history won't be so kind.

Yeah, some analysts are saying that the stock market might plunge 30% in the next few months over sub-prime loans.

If that scenario happens (which I don't believe but you never know I'm no expert), people will be shouting for his blood.

Northcott
09-16-2007, 09:31 PM
Yeah, some analysts are saying that the stock market might plunge 30% in the next few months over sub-prime loans.

If that scenario happens (which I don't believe but you never know I'm no expert), people will be shouting for his blood.

Jeebus. 30%?!? Oh, man. That particular sting would have unpleasantly long reach.

Freedom Canadian
09-16-2007, 10:05 PM
Well, most analysts expect a smaller effect, of course. But yeah, it would be quite disastrous.