PDA

View Full Version : Currency changes coming?


Ancalagon
10-15-2010, 12:04 AM
This could be pretty darn interesting...

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/currencies/foreign-exchange-tensions-ease/article1757901/

Foreign-exchange tensions ease

A peace accord remains a long way off, but the outlines of a truce are starting to form in the global row over currencies.

China allowed the yuan to rise to a record against the U.S. dollar and Singapore’s central bank loosened its grip on that country’s currency, presenting a glimmer of hope that tensions over foreign-exchange rates can be eased before they spark a trade war.



Foreign-exchange markets were a frenzy of activity again Thursday, as the dollar tumbled to a new 15-year low against the yen, the loonie flew past parity with its U.S. counterpart and the Australian dollar drew nearly even with the greenback for the first time in three decades. The Canadian dollar closed at 99.4 cents (U.S.)

The decisions by China and Singapore to allow greater appreciation are significant because East Asia’s export-dependent nations have been reluctant to allow the value of their currencies to rise in tandem with their fast-growing economies, an issue that has been at the heart of what Brazil’s finance minister on Sept. 27 called an international “currency war.”

China’s stubborn accumulation of foreign-exchange reserves is combining with ultra-loose monetary policy in the United States to disrupt normal investment flows.

With the U.S. Federal Reserve contemplating creating hundreds of billions of dollars to buy financial assets, there is little prospect of turning a quick profit in the world’s largest economy. International investors would love to exploit China’s white-hot economy, but the government’s policies block them from taking full advantage.

As a result, investors are flocking to whatever country offers yield, whether that be a country such as Brazil, the strongest economy in Latin America, or one such as Canada, where the central bank has been raising interest rates and the finances are relatively sound.

The labelling of the tensions as a “currency war” by Brazilian Finance Minister Guido Mantega might have been an exaggeration, since evidence suggests countries are fighting against volatility in foreign-exchange markets rather than actively seeking to undermine their trading partners.

Still, no one denies that anxiety is running high.

Countries on the periphery of the world’s largest economies aren’t keen about accepting stronger currencies either. That’s increasing the risk of what Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty on the weekend called a “cacophony” of retaliatory measures that would disrupt trade and choke the recovery.

Finance ministers and central bankers, who failed to ease tensions at meetings in Washington last week, must try again when they gather in Gyeongju, South Korea, next week for a Group of 20 meeting, South African Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan said Thursday.

Echoing his Brazilian counterpart, Mr. Gordhan told lawmakers in Cape Town that the world is headed for a “currency war” unless the G20 gets “the major players to sit around the table and find a spirit of co-operation and generosity and give and take,” according to an account of his remarks by Bloomberg News.

East Asian countries, including Thailand and South Korea, are aggressive managers of their exchange rates, seeking to keep them relatively weak as part of their export-driven growth strategies that result in wide trade surpluses.

China points its finger at the Federal Reserve, suggesting that its policy is really meant to weaken the dollar. The thought surely registers with Fed officials, but the accusation underplays the damage that would be wrought if the U.S. slipped back into recession.

Another problem with China’s argument is that it distracts from the fact that it is emerging markets that are doing the intervening. According to Jens Norvig of Nomura Securities, emerging-market countries have spent more than 7 per cent of their aggregate gross domestic product this year intervening in foreign-exchange markets, compared with 0.6 per cent of GDP by advanced economies. “The ‘currency war’ really is about the big surplus countries in the world, especially China,” Mr. Norvig, who is based in New York, said in a report Thursday.

Always an irritant, Asian currency policy now risks inciting retaliation by the U.S. and Europe, as advanced economies struggle to rebound from the global recession amid elevated debt levels and high unemployment.

The U.S. trade deficit with China widened to a record in August, and claims by Americans for jobless benefits rose for a second-consecutive week, according to separate reports Thursday that will feed a growing appetite in Congress to hit back at the country’s trading partners. Max Baucus, the Democratic head of the senate finance committee, said Wednesday on a trip to Beijing that senators may well endorse a House bill that would allow U.S. exporters to seek retribution for China’s exchange-rate policy, which would put the measure in front of President Barack Obama for his signature.

China is widely considered the linchpin in a broad appreciation of Asian currencies that would, according to the International Monetary Fund and most other economists, generate demand for U.S. and European exporters by making imports cheaper. As the dominant economic force in the region, China sets the tone in currency markets because neighbours such as Thailand must keep their foreign-exchange rates in line with the yuan in order to remain competitive.

The International Monetary Fund last week suggested that Asian exporters form a pact to allow their exchange rates to rise in concert, to mitigate worries that the first-mover risks getting punished if no one else follows.

Singapore’s dollar rose to a record after the Monetary Authority of Singapore said Thursday that it will steepen and widen the trading band that it sets for the currency. The monetary authority, which uses the currency to control inflation, allowed the island nation’s dollar to appreciate even in the face of weaker economic growth, saying rapid price increases was the bigger worry.

China’s currency climbed to its highest against the dollar since a peg was dropped in July, 2005, and is about 2.5-per-cent higher since the country’s central bank pledged on June 19 to allow more flexibility. That’s not fast enough to satisfy Congress, but it is getting the attention of U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who has been more vocal in his criticism of China in recent weeks.

“China over the last six weeks or so has started to let their currency appreciate at a pretty significant pace,” Mr. Geithner said this week. “They're starting to let it move, and what we want to do is to maximize the incentives they have to let that process go as far as it needs to go.”

Black Angel
10-15-2010, 01:25 AM
It's huge news over here that our dollar is very nearly at parity with the US. In fact many are predicting that it will surpass it within 2 weeks. What is interesting is that it is only just gradually increasing in relation to other currencies, so really it is the US dollar that is decreasing in value.

Enk
10-15-2010, 03:06 PM
It's huge news over here that our dollar is very nearly at parity with the US. In fact many are predicting that it will surpass it within 2 weeks. What is interesting is that it is only just gradually increasing in relation to other currencies, so really it is the US dollar that is decreasing in value.

A dollar in freefall is very bad for Asia. A slow decline, however, is probably better for everyone.

Ideally, we'll have currency parity across all the industrialized nations.

hobbiteer
10-15-2010, 04:48 PM
Is this where we talk about the "amero"?

Hatter
10-15-2010, 08:20 PM
A dollar in freefall is very bad for Asia. A slow decline, however, is probably better for everyone.

Ideally, we'll have currency parity across all the industrialized nations.

Agreed, currency parity will increase economic stability, it will be a good thing overall.

Aloysius
10-16-2010, 04:14 AM
Agreed, currency parity will increase economic stability, it will be a good thing overall.

Currency parity is a fiction, and will never be reached. Mark my words. Stuff like inflation, speculation and deregulated markets make it impossible.
You probably know that more dollar/yen/pounds/euros are traded every day by speculators than have been emitted by the central banks of the world ?

That, and it's impossible to define an overall parity. If you use buying power parity, then buying power of what ? Food ? Car ? Services ? The relative prices of those differs widely depending of a country's demographic and economic structure. Prices won't have the same proportion in a country like the USA (big, lots of food produced cheaply, dynamic demography, declining industry) and Japan (small, space and food is expansive, population is ageing, industry is still powerful and not so much in decline).

Economy is not a science of rational process. It's all about power relationship. China can do what it wants with its money because it is strong. EU is unable to do anything with its money (and its relative value), suffering with the decisions made by Beijing or Washington, because it is weak. Same thing about Japan : their monetary policy is destroyed by Beijing.

Ancalagon
10-16-2010, 10:36 PM
World parity = single currency. A lot of people have a vested interest in making sure there is not a single world currency, because on one hand it gives economic options to a country, but more importantly because it's a way for some rich people to get richer by playing number games.

Name Lips
10-17-2010, 11:23 AM
The inevitable result of globilization is a world government, and a world currency. Eventually the rate of communication and spread of culture will increase to the point where regional distinctions between countries and culture are erased.

The world is becoming smaller.

This causes cultures to feel threatened and "under attack." Extremists shout that the world is coming to an end. The Japanese extremists, the Islamists, the Tea Party... all desperatly kicking and fighting as they see what they consider moral and precious slipping away...

But the only alternative is national isolationism and demonization of "outsiders," which cut you off from the benefits of the global market and makes it harder to find allies....

It will take several more centuries, but I really think global unity is inevitable, and will result in the erasure of most cultures as we know them.

Caliphis
10-18-2010, 09:16 AM
Why do people always assume that the erasure of a culture is a bad thing? Cultures are lost, or absorbed into other cultures and the world goes on. People find something new to latch on to.

Ancalagon
10-18-2010, 07:10 PM
The biggest advantage IMO of having a world government could be better distribution of resources, try to spread the wealth a little. The biggest disadvantage is that if the government is bad, we are so screwed.

Pigs in Space
10-19-2010, 10:54 PM
The biggest advantage IMO of having a world government could be better distribution of resources, try to spread the wealth a little. The biggest disadvantage is that if the government is bad, we are so screwed.

Well, there is also the problem that there is not nearly enough resources to go round.

But after we suffer through that, I guess the world goverment could implement a reasonable population control policy.

Aloysius
10-20-2010, 11:20 AM
A world government is a big no-no for me. The hell with it. There are something like...99% it will turn up a brutal, corrupt and inescapable dictatorship. Civil war and random genocide added in the mix thanks to religious stupidity.

I'm all for the cooperation of states, for the creation of various regional unions like the EU. Ok. But nothing more, thank you very much.

We have already enough problem in the EU defending non-pasteurized cheese against the various Germanic tribes of the North without having to fight the Muslims for saving our wines and porc delicacy. And then the Americans would ask us to let Scientology and Goldman & Sachs rule everything while the Chinese would impose a ban on the internet. No, no, no.

Space Cadet B^3
10-20-2010, 11:31 AM
We're doomed either way, so I don't care who holds the gun. This is the price I pay for absolutely loving my candidate and watching him be brutally hamstringed and unable to do everything he wants to. Votes no longer matter anymore. i don't know if there's a reason to vote ever again...