PDA

View Full Version : EMT charged with posting photos of corpse on Facebook


Lady Fury
06-05-2009, 12:21 AM
Link (http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/04/ny.facebook.corpse/index.html?eref=rss_topstories)

NEW YORK (CNN) -- A New York City emergency medical technician is facing misdemeanor charges after being accused of taking a picture of a female murder victim and then posting it to his Facebook page.

Mark Musarella, 49, was in court Thursday awaiting arraignment on charges of misdemeanor official misconduct. The retired New York Police detective is accused of posting the picture of a 26-year-old woman's corpse. The woman was found strangled with a hair-dryer cord March 30 on Staten Island, according to authorities, and a 28-year-old man has been charged in her death.

According to Musarella's lawyer, Edward J. Pavia Jr., the appearance of the photo on the social networking site was a technical mistake and not a morbid act. Pavia said years of working as a detective instinctively led Musarella to take the picture after he was called to the scene of the death.

"He's deeply sorry for any pain this incident has caused the family of the victim," Pavia told CNN by phone Thursday evening. "The posting of the photo was completely inadvertent, done completely by accident."

When asked how a photo could accidentally be posted to a Facebook page, Pavia said his client sent the photo along with many others on his camera phone without realizing it was still there.

"We will be able to prove very easily that this photo wasn't sent by itself, " said Pavia, adding that Musarella spent 20 years with the NYPD, and he was cited numerous times for honorable work.

Despite media reports that Musarella was fired from his job as an EMT at Richmond University Medical Center Hospital in Staten Island, Pavia insisted Musarella quit the job about three weeks ago.

So do you think he deserves the charges?

Schizm
06-05-2009, 12:32 AM
Link (http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/04/ny.facebook.corpse/index.html?eref=rss_topstories)



So do you think he deserves the charges? My question is why was he taking a picture of the corpse? He isn't a coroner or a cop. Do EMTs normally take pics of people that are hurt or dead as part of their job?



According to Musarella's lawyer, Edward J. Pavia Jr., the appearance of the photo on the social networking site was a technical mistake and not a morbid act. Pavia said years of working as a detective instinctively led Musarella to take the picture after he was called to the scene of the death.

so... not reading the article you posted?

Lady Fury
06-05-2009, 12:34 AM
so... not reading the article you posted?

Oops. I read it while watching tv. I shall go hang my head in shame now.:o

Name Lips
06-05-2009, 12:37 AM
I can understand an ex-detective having the foresight to take a picture of an undisturbed murder scene. It's basic evidence gathering. I would also expect him to hand it over to the detectives actually working on the case. It seems awfully shortsighted for him to have just "forgotten" he had a picture of a murdered woman on his camera. Maybe that kind of error is why he's an ex-detective.

Brynja
06-05-2009, 06:05 AM
Posting it on facebook?

Height of idiocy.

He deserves the charges.

nerfherder
06-05-2009, 06:21 AM
He deserves the charges, and the judge should take into account the fact that it was accidental rather than deliberate when setting sentence (assuming he's found guilty).

Brynja
06-05-2009, 07:25 AM
How do you accidentally take a photo and post it on facebook?

nerfherder
06-05-2009, 07:51 AM
How do you accidentally take a photo and post it on facebook?
Sorry, I should have clarified - taking the photo was deliberate, publishing it on facebook was accidental. How it happened is in the OP (it was amongst a group of other photos, he'd forgotten it was there, and he'd just uploaded them all).

Utrecht
06-05-2009, 08:21 AM
Sorry, I should have clarified - taking the photo was deliberate, publishing it on facebook was accidental. How it happened is in the OP (it was amongst a group of other photos, he'd forgotten it was there, and he'd just uploaded them all).


This - ignorance does not equal not guilty.

Judge should hammer him hard on the taking picture part (not his job or responsability (that I am aware of)) and be leanient on the posting part.

Varaj
06-05-2009, 08:35 AM
This - ignorance does not equal not guilty.

Judge should hammer him hard on the taking picture part (not his job or responsability (that I am aware of)) and be leanient on the posting part.

Is taking pictures the crime of misconduct or is it only the posting?