PDA

View Full Version : The Sarah Palin Letter


FeatsofClay
09-06-2008, 09:23 AM
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/kilkenny.asp


I am a resident of Wasilla, Alaska. I have known Sarah since 1992.
Everyone here knows Sarah, so it is nothing special to say we are on a
first-name basis. Our children have attended the same schools. Her
father was my child’s favorite substitute teacher. I also am on a
first name basis with her parents and mother-in-law. I attended more
City Council meetings during her administration than about 99% of the
residents of the city.

She is enormously popular; in every way she’s like the most popular
girl in middle school. Even men who think she is a poor choice and
won’t vote for her can’t quit smiling when talking about her because
she is a “babe”.

It is astonishing and almost scary how well she can keep a secret. She
kept her most recent pregnancy a secret from her children and parents
for seven months.

She is “pro-life”. She recently gave birth to a Down’s syndrome baby.
There is no cover-up involved, here; Trig is her baby.

She is energetic and hardworking. She regularly worked out at the gym.

She is savvy. She doesn’t take positions; she just “puts things out
there” and if they prove to be popular, then she takes credit.

Her husband works a union job on the North Slope for BP and is a
champion snowmobile racer. Todd Palin’s kind of job is highly
sought-after because of the schedule and high pay. He arranges his
work schedule so he can fish for salmon in Bristol Bay for a month or
so in summer, but by no stretch of the imagination is fishing their
major source of income. Nor has her life-style ever been anything
like that of native Alaskans.

Sarah and her whole family are avid hunters.

She’s smart.

Her experience is as mayor of a city with a population of about 5,000
(at the time), and less than 2 years as governor of a state with about
670,000 residents.

During her mayoral administration most of the actual work of running
this small city was turned over to an administrator. She had been
pushed to hire this administrator by party power-brokers after she had
gotten herself into some trouble over precipitous firings which had
given rise to a recall campaign.

Sarah campaigned in Wasilla as a “fiscal conservative”. During her 6
years as Mayor, she increased general government expenditures by over
33%. During those same 6 years the amount of taxes collected by the
City increased by 38%. This was during a period of low inflation
(1996-2002). She reduced progressive property taxes and increased a
regressive sales tax which taxed even food. The tax cuts that she
promoted benefited large corporate property owners way more than they
benefited residents.

The huge increases in tax revenues during her mayoral administration
weren’t enough to fund everything on her wish list though, borrowed
money was needed, too. She inherited a city with zero debt, but left it
with indebtedness of over $22 million. What did Mayor Palin encourage
the voters to borrow money for? Was it the infrastructure that she said
she supported? The sewage treatment plant that the city lacked? or a
new library? No. $1m for a park. $15m-plus for construction of a
multi-use sports complex which she rushed through to build on a piece
of property that the City didn’t even have clear title to, that was
still in litigation 7 yrs later–to the delight of the lawyers
involved! The sports complex itself is a nice addition to the
community but a huge money pit, not the profit-generator she claimed it
would be. She also supported bonds for $5.5m for road projects that
could have been done in 5-7 yrs without any borrowing.

While Mayor, City Hall was extensively remodeled and her office
redecorated more than once.

These are small numbers, but Wasilla is a very small city.

As an oil producer, the high price of oil has created a budget surplus
in Alaska. Rather than invest this surplus in technology that will
make us energy independent and increase efficiency, as Governor she
proposed distribution of this surplus to every individual in the state.

In this time of record state revenues and budget surpluses, she
recommended that the state borrow/bond for road projects, even while
she proposed distribution of surplus state revenues: spend today’s
surplus, borrow for needs.

She’s not very tolerant of divergent opinions or open to outside ideas
or compromise. As Mayor, she fought ideas that weren’t generated by
her or her staff. Ideas weren’t evaluated on their merits, but on the
basis of who proposed them.

While Sarah was Mayor of Wasilla she tried to fire our highly respected
City Librarian because the Librarian refused to consider removing from
the library some books that Sarah wanted removed. City residents
rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin’s
attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew
her termination letter. People who fought her attempt to oust the
Librarian are on her enemies list to this day.

Sarah complained about the “old boy’s club” when she first ran for
Mayor, so what did she bring Wasilla? A new set of “old boys”. Palin
fired most of the experienced staff she inherited. At the City and as
Governor she hired or elevated new, inexperienced, obscure people,
creating a staff totally dependent on her for their jobs and eternally
grateful and fiercely loyal–loyal to the point of abusing their power
to further her personal agenda, as she has acknowledged happened in the
case of pressuring the State’s top cop (see below).

As Mayor, Sarah fired Wasilla’s Police Chief because he “intimidated”
her, she told the press. As Governor, her recent firing of Alaska’s top
cop has the ring of familiarity about it. He served at her pleasure
and she had every legal right to fire him, but it’s pretty clear that
an important factor in her decision to fire him was because he wouldn’t
fire her sister’s ex-husband, a State Trooper. Under investigation
for abuse of power, she has had to admit that more than 2 dozen
contacts were made between her staff and family to the person that she
later fired, pressuring him to fire her ex-brother-in-law. She tried to
replace the man she fired with a man who she knew had been reprimanded
for sexual harassment; when this caused a public furor, she withdrew
her support.

She has bitten the hand of every person who extended theirs to her in
help. The City Council person who personally escorted her around town
introducing her to voters when she first ran for Wasilla City Council
became one of her first targets when she was later elected Mayor. She
abruptly fired her loyal City Administrator; even people who didn’t
like the guy were stunned by this ruthlessness.

Fear of retribution has kept all of these people from saying anything
publicly about her.

When then-Governor Murkowski was handing out political plums, Sarah got
the best, Chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission: one
of the few jobs not in Juneau and one of the best paid. She had no
background in oil & gas issues. Within months of scoring this great
job which paid $122,400/yr, she was complaining in the press about the
high salary. I was told that she hated that job: the commute, the
structured hours, the work. Sarah became aware that a member of this
Commission (who was also the State Chair of the Republican Party)
engaged in unethical behavior on the job. In a gutsy move which some
undoubtedly cautioned her could be political suicide, Sarah solved all
her problems in one fell swoop: got out of the job she hated and
garnered gobs of media attention as the patron saint of ethics and as a
gutsy fighter against the “old boys’ club” when she dramatically quit,
exposing this man’s ethics violations (for which he was fined).

As Mayor, she had her hand stuck out as far as anyone for pork from
Senator Ted Stevens. Lately, she has castigated his pork-barrel
politics and publicly humiliated him. She only opposed the “bridge to
nowhere” after it became clear that it would be unwise not to.

As Governor, she gave the Legislature no direction and budget
guidelines, then made a big grandstand display of line-item vetoing
projects, calling them pork. Public outcry and further legislative
action restored most of these projects–which had been vetoed simply
because she was not aware of their importance–but with the unobservant
she had gained a reputation as “anti-pork”.

She is solidly Republican: no political maverick. The State party
leaders hate her because she has bit them in the back and humiliated
them. Other members of the party object to her self-description as a
fiscal conservative.

Around Wasilla there are people who went to high school with Sarah.
They call her “Sarah Barracuda” because of her unbridled ambition and
predatory ruthlessness. Before she became so powerful, very ugly
stories circulated around town about shenanigans she pulled to be made
point guard on the high school basketball team. When Sarah’s
mother-in-law, a highly respected member of the community and
experienced manager, ran for Mayor, Sarah refused to endorse her.

As Governor, she stepped outside of the box and put together of package
of legislation known as “AGIA” that forced the oil companies to march
to the beat of her drum.

Like most Alaskans, she favors drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge. She has questioned if the loss of sea ice is linked to
global warming. She campaigned “as a private citizen” against a state
initiaitive that would have either a) protected salmon streams from
pollution from mines, or b) tied up in the courts all mining in the
state (depending on who you listen to). She has pushed the State’s
lawsuit against the Dept. of the Interior’s decision to list polar
bears as threatened species.

McCain is the oldest person to ever run for President; Sarah will be a
heartbeat away from being President.

There has to be literally millions of Americans who are more
knowledgeable and experienced than she.

However, there’s a lot of people who have underestimated her and are
regretting it.

CLAIM VS FACT
•“Hockey mom”: true for a few years
•“PTA mom”: true years ago when her first-born was in elementary
school, not since
•“NRA supporter”: absolutely true
•social conservative: mixed. Opposes gay marriage, BUT vetoed a bill
that would have denied benefits to employees in same-sex relationships
(said she did this because it was unconsitutional).
•pro-creationism: mixed. Supports it, BUT did nothing as Governor to
promote it.
•“Pro-life”: mixed. Knowingly gave birth to a Down’s syndrome baby
BUT declined to call a special legislative session on some pro-life
legislation
•“Experienced”: Some high schools have more students than Wasilla has
residents. Many cities have more residents than the state of Alaska.
No legislative experience other than City Council. Little hands-on
supervisory or managerial experience; needed help of a city
administrator to run town of about 5,000.
•political maverick: not at all
•gutsy: absolutely!
•open & transparent: ??? Good at keeping secrets. Not good at
explaining actions.
•has a developed philosophy of public policy: no
•”a Greenie”: no. Turned Wasilla into a wasteland of big box stores
and disconnected parking lots. Is pro-drilling off-shore and in ANWR.
•fiscal conservative: not by my definition!
•pro-infrastructure: No. Promoted a sports complex and park in a city
without a sewage treatment plant or storm drainage system. Built
streets to early 20th century standards.
•pro-tax relief: Lowered taxes for businesses, increased tax burden on
residents
•pro-small government: No. Oversaw greatest expansion of city
government in Wasilla’s history.
•pro-labor/pro-union. No. Just because her husband works union
doesn’t make her pro-labor. I have seen nothing to support any claim
that she is pro-labor/pro-union.

WHY AM I WRITING THIS?

First, I have long believed in the importance of being an informed
voter. I am a voter registrar. For 10 years I put on student voting
programs in the schools. If you google my name (Anne Kilkenny +
Alaska), you will find references to my participation in local
government, education, and PTA/parent organizations.

Secondly, I’ve always operated in the belief that “Bad things happen
when good people stay silent”. Few people know as much as I do because
few have gone to as many City Council meetings.

Third, I am just a housewife. I don’t have a job she can bump me out
of. I don’t belong to any organization that she can hurt. But, I am no
fool; she is immensely popular here, and it is likely that this will
cost me somehow in the future: that’s life.

Fourth, she has hated me since back in 1996, when I was one of the 100
or so people who rallied to support the City Librarian against Sarah’s
attempt at censorship.

Fifth, I looked around and realized that everybody else was afraid to
say anything because they were somehow vulnerable.

CAVEATS
I am not a statistician. I developed the numbers for the increase in
spending & taxation 2 years ago (when Palin was running for Governor)
from information supplied to me by the Finance Director of the City of
Wasilla, and I can’t recall exactly what I adjusted for: did I adjust
for inflation? for population increases? Right now, it is impossible
for a private person to get any info out of City Hall–they are
swamped. So I can’t verify my numbers.

You may have noticed that there are various numbers circulating for the
population of Wasilla, ranging from my “about 5,000″, up to 9,000. The
day Palin’s selection was announced a city official told me that the
current population is about 7,000. The official 2000 census count was
5,460. I have used about 5,000 because Palin was Mayor from 1996 to
2002, and the city was growing rapidly in the mid-90’s.

Anne Kilkenny

Varaj
09-06-2008, 10:33 AM
Damn that is a harsh letter.

AZRogue
09-06-2008, 10:35 AM
It is. Brings up a lot of interesting points, too. Hopefully, once Palin starts talking to the press directly, she gets asked about most of these. I'm curious to hear her response.

Snatch
09-06-2008, 10:40 AM
I still can't fathom that she's the most qualified person for the VP position that McCain could find. It is such a strange choice.

It'll be interesting to see what comes out of this letter...if anything.

AZRogue
09-06-2008, 10:48 AM
I still can't fathom that she's the most qualified person for the VP position that McCain could find. It is such a strange choice.

It'll be interesting to see what comes out of this letter...if anything.

I don't know. Contrary to what they've been claiming, I tend to think that she was chosen mostly because 1. she's a woman, 2. she's supposed to be socially conservative and would appeal to the Republican base, and 3. she'd be a surprise and would get people talking about something other than the last eight years.

She's new, so that alone gives McCain's campaign a little bit of psuedo-change. It's not real, but the new face will make it easier for some people to forget, IMO. Seems to have worked, too. Everyone's talking about her. I really want to see her grilled by the press, though, before forming more opinions on her. One nicely delivered speech (IMO) doesn't a political candidate make.

Name Lips
09-06-2008, 10:49 AM
From what I hear, McCain has a history of doing strange and surprising things at the last minute that are either idiocy or genius. Most of the time they work out for him.

Emerald is on a messageboard for parents of lots of kids. Most of them are conservative Catholics and they're all RAVING about Palin. She is literally their dream pick.

But all of those women were going to be voting Republican anyway. I'm not sure Palin picked up many "undecided" votes. She's energizing the core constituancy but not much else.

AZRogue
09-06-2008, 10:54 AM
From what I hear, McCain has a history of doing strange and surprising things at the last minute that are either idiocy or genius. Most of the time they work out for him.

Emerald is on a messageboard for parents of lots of kids. Most of them are conservative Catholics and they're all RAVING about Palin. She is literally their dream pick.

But all of those women were going to be voting Republican anyway. I'm not sure Palin picked up many "undecided" votes. She's energizing the core constituancy but not much else.

Same with my family. They would have voted Republican anyway, IMO (mostly--I know they loved Bill Clinton, for instance, so they don't vote down the party line by any means), but my mom, grandmother, and aunts are all going on about her. Only one of them goes to church, though, and none catholic.

Hatter
09-06-2008, 01:50 PM
After seeing Huckabee on the Daily Show I'm kind of sad he didn't get picked. Not that I'd vote for him since he's my ideological opposite, but at least he's funny.

Harry
09-06-2008, 02:39 PM
Huckabee is a smooth talker. He's a born rainmaker if there ever was one.

Snatch
09-07-2008, 12:33 PM
I don't know. Contrary to what they've been claiming, I tend to think that she was chosen mostly because 1. she's a woman, 2. she's supposed to be socially conservative and would appeal to the Republican base, and 3. she'd be a surprise and would get people talking about something other than the last eight years.

Which would be a brilliant strategy if she had substance, but so far everything I've seen hasn't demonstrated she has the experience for such an executive decision.

However..

I really want to see her grilled by the press, though, before forming more opinions on her. One nicely delivered speech (IMO) doesn't a political candidate make.

I am in full agreement here. Maybe she's a political savant and just hasn't had the chance to shine yet.

Sobek
09-07-2008, 02:30 PM
It is. Brings up a lot of interesting points, too. Hopefully, once Palin starts talking to the press directly, she gets asked about most of these. I'm curious to hear her response.
Agreed.

Most of them are conservative Catholics and they're all RAVING about Palin. She is literally their dream pick.
I'd only heard the name once or twice, so I spent a couple hours cruising the web when she was announced. I've got to say, I really, really liked what I saw. I hope the letter is sour grapes and she's generally what she seems (to me).

That said, I long ago gave up my illusions that there's any such thing as an honest politician above a pretty low level. I won't be surprised if the letter turns out to be true. I'll still vote for her, though.

If I assume (and I do) Obama is at least as crooked as Palin might be, then it comes down to whose narcissism is going to produce results I disagree with less.

Singularity
09-07-2008, 04:08 PM
If I assume (and I do) Obama is at least as crooked as Palin might be, then it comes down to whose narcissism is going to produce results I disagree with less.

Where's your evidence that Obama's crooked? You have several pieces of evidence suggesting that Palin is crooked, fairly unintelligent, and hypocritical. What drives you to make the same conclusions about Obama?

obryn
09-07-2008, 04:11 PM
The Republican party is keeping Palin away from the press for about two weeks. She's going through boot camp, more or less, so she can be in alignment with McCain's views and campaign.

Because, you know, she's ready on day one. Or fifteen. Whatever.

-O

Singularity
09-07-2008, 04:12 PM
The Republican party is keeping Palin away from the press for about two weeks. She's going through boot camp, more or less, so she can be in alignment with McCain's views and campaign.

Because, you know, she's ready on day one. Or fifteen. Whatever.

-O

Robocandidate!

(tell me that wouldn't make a good macro)

AZRogue
09-07-2008, 04:14 PM
It doesn't matter (at the moment). I'm waiting for Palin to start giving interviews and see what shakes out. She WILL be asked about this letter, I'm confident--too many people I know in real life that don't frequent the internet have brought it up--and I want to know what she says.

Sobek
09-07-2008, 04:14 PM
Where's your evidence that Obama's crooked? You have several pieces of evidence suggesting that Palin is crooked, fairly unintelligent, and hypocritical. What drives you to make the same conclusions about Obama?
Watching his campaign. Seriously, how can you not believe he's crooked?

He's a politician, just like any other. If you happen to agree with what he's saying, that's great. But, it's this sort of annointing that drives the "talk radio" people (who I rarely listen to, anymore) to call him "Apollo" or "messiah" or whatever the dig du jour is.

Of course, coming from my personal political stand, I'd like Obama even less if I though he actually believed everything he's saying.

Sobek
09-07-2008, 04:16 PM
It doesn't matter (at the moment). I'm waiting for Palin to start giving interviews and see what shakes out. She WILL be asked about this letter, I'm confident--too many people I know in real life that don't frequent the internet have brought it up--and I want to know what she says.
This. As I've said, I like the rhetoric. But, I'd like McCain's rhetoric, too, if I knew less about him. We'll see whether Palin resembles who she claims to be.

Singularity
09-07-2008, 04:22 PM
Watching his campaign. Seriously, how can you not believe he's crooked?

Well, since I don't assume that every black man is crooked, I have very little to lead me to that conclusion. His background and his politics lead me to believe that he's the real deal.

He's a politician, just like any other. If you happen to agree with what he's saying, that's great. But, it's this sort of annointing that drives the "talk radio" people (who I rarely listen to, anymore) to call him "Apollo" or "messiah" or whatever the dig du jour is.

Most public servants are honest and do a good job. I's argue that a guy who beat the odds for his party by being the first black man nominated, and who appealed to people directly, and based on their character judgment of him, were willing to finance his campaign (the average donation to his campaign was something like $25) to the point where he didn't have to take public money for his campaign, there's a pretty good chance that he really isn't a politics as usual type of candidate. It would have been easier for him to just take public money, and money from lobbyists like every other politician, but he wants to go into the white house without being in anyone's pocket. His candidacy is unique.

AZRogue
09-07-2008, 04:26 PM
Well, since I don't assume that every black man is crooked, I have very little to lead me to that conclusion. His background and his politics lead me to believe that he's the real deal.



Don't be obtuse. He believes Obama is crooked because he's a politician. Race has nothing to do with it. It's a common belief, and hardly new or unique. The more powerful or talented the politician, the more crooked he is usually perceived. Corrupt politicians is so common a belief that it's cliche.

Sobek
09-07-2008, 04:31 PM
Well, since I don't assume that every black man is crooked, I have very little to lead me to that conclusion. His background and his politics lead me to believe that he's the real deal.
Dude, for as many times we've slung shit at each other, have I ever given you any reason to believe that I'm at all racist?

There are two options:
1) You're either being a complete dick.
2) You've drank enough of the Obama Kool-Aid that you're reciting the talking points without even realizing it.

Singularity
09-07-2008, 04:55 PM
Dude, for as many times we've slung shit at each other, have I ever given you any reason to believe that I'm at all racist?

There are two options:
1) You're either being a complete dick.
2) You've drank enough of the Obama Kool-Aid that you're reciting the talking points without even realizing it.

How about option 3 - I'm messing with you?

Sobek
09-07-2008, 05:17 PM
How about option 3 - I'm messing with you?
Talk to your wife about smilies. ;)

Utrecht
09-09-2008, 05:27 PM
As a follow up to this - a significant portion of this letter has been shown to be false.

from factcheck.org


Summary
We've been flooded for the past few days with queries about dubious Internet postings and mass e-mail messages making claims about McCain's running mate, Gov. Palin. We find that many are completely false, or misleading.

Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didn't cut it at all. In fact, she tripled per-pupil funding over just three years.


She did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. The librarian has said Palin asked a "What if?" question, but the librarian continued in her job through most of Palin's first term.

She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group that wants Alaskans to vote on whether they wish to secede from the United States. She's been registered as a Republican since May 1982.

Palin never endorsed or supported Pat Buchanan for president. She once wore a Buchanan button as a "courtesy" when he visited Wasilla, but shortly afterward she was appointed to co-chair of the campaign of Steve Forbes in the state.

Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska's schools. She has said that students should be allowed to "debate both sides" of the evolution question, but she also said creationism "doesn't have to be part of the curriculum."

We'll be looking into other charges in an e-mail by a woman named Anne Kilkenny for a future story. For more explanation of the bullet points above, please read the Analysis.


In fact - this information is making me more favorably inclined towards her.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/157986/page/1

AZRogue
09-09-2008, 11:45 PM
Yeah, I'm sure there are a few things that have been spun out of proportion. It's inevitable, really, no matter who it is. Palin just is recent and the most visible.

Like the fact that I've read claims that she is against birth control, but she states that she is actually for contraception.

I know she's on ABC (I think that's the station) on Thursday for her first interview. I'm wondering what kind of interview it will be and what kind of questions will be asked.

Name Lips
09-10-2008, 12:56 AM
Maybe she'll hand-pick the interviewer from her own people.

AZRogue
09-10-2008, 01:00 AM
Maybe she'll hand-pick the interviewer from her own people.

Can sombody do that? That's pretty crazy, if true. If it's an ABC interview, wouldn't it have to be an ABC interviewer? That's pretty disappointing if they can put a member of their staff into that position. I've never heard of such a thing, though I've never thought to look.

Name Lips
09-10-2008, 01:05 AM
I was just poking fun at the idea that she wants to have the inquiry into her past misbehavior headed by her own people.

AZRogue
09-10-2008, 01:08 AM
I was just poking fun at the idea that she wants to have the inquiry into her past misbehavior headed by her own people.

Oh, heh, that makes sense. Sorry. I see something that surprises me on here nearly every day so just assumed it was another blow to my fragile grasp on reality.