PDA

View Full Version : Didn't the New Yorker used to be classy?


Name Lips
07-14-2008, 01:50 PM
Link (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25673296/)


Magazine's 'satirical' cover stirs controversy
Publication shows candidate dressed as a Muslim, his wife as a terrorist

WASHINGTON - Barack Obama's campaign says a satirical New Yorker magazine cover showing the Democratic presidential candidate dressed as a Muslim and his wife as a terrorist is "tasteless and offensive."

The illustration on the issue that hits newsstands Monday, titled "The Politics of Fear" and drawn by Barry Blitt, depicts Barack Obama wearing sandals, robe and a turban and his wife, Michelle, dressed in camouflage, combat boots and an assault rifle strapped over her shoulder — standing in the Oval Office.

The couple is doing a fist tap in front of a fireplace in which an American flag is burning. Over the mantel hangs a portrait of Osama bin Laden.

"The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Senator Obama's right-wing critics have tried to create," said Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton. "But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree."

In a statement Monday, the magazine said the cover "combines a number of fantastical images about the Obamas and shows them for the obvious distortions they are."

"The burning flag, the nationalist-radical and Islamic outfits, the fist-bump, the portrait on the wall? All of them echo one attack or another. Satire is part of what we do, and it is meant to bring things out into the open, to hold up a mirror to prejudice, the hateful, and the absurd. And that's the spirit of this cover," the New Yorker statement said.

The statement also pointed to the two articles on Obama contained inside the magazine, calling them "very serious."

In Arizona, Republican John McCain said the cover was "totally inappropriate and frankly I understand if Senator Obama and his supporters would find it offensive."

Already the cover was generating controversy on the Internet.

The Huffington Post, a left-leaning blog, said: "Anyone who's tried to paint Obama as a Muslim, anyone who's tried to portray Michelle as angry or a secret revolutionary out to get Whitey, anyone who has questioned their patriotism — well, here's your image."

OK, so it's a satire of the image the extreme right-wingers are trying to paint of Obama and his wife. It's still in horrible taste to publish such an image on the front of a magazine. Especially in election year. Especially when Obama has been trying to fight these misperceptions for months now. Especially when lots of people will probably see the cover and not read any of the content explaining it. Especially when internet retards are going to scan it in and use it as their avatar.

Ah, well, what's done is done. :(

Limper
07-14-2008, 01:54 PM
Link (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25673296/)



OK, so it's a satire of the image the extreme right-wingers are trying to paint of Obama and his wife. It's still in horrible taste to publish such an image on the front of a magazine. Especially in election year. Especially when Obama has been trying to fight these misperceptions for months now. Especially when lots of people will probably see the cover and not read any of the content explaining it. Especially when internet retards are going to scan it in and use it as their avatar.

Ah, well, what's done is done. :(


New York elected Hillary so it should be expected they'd have an odd sense of humor.

In NYC I'm sure they get it right off and being NYC they are unaware that the rest of the country exists.

Ancalagon
07-14-2008, 08:37 PM
Link (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25673296/)



OK, so it's a satire of the image the extreme right-wingers are trying to paint of Obama and his wife. It's still in horrible taste to publish such an image on the front of a magazine. Especially in election year. Especially when Obama has been trying to fight these misperceptions for months now. Especially when lots of people will probably see the cover and not read any of the content explaining it. Especially when internet retards are going to scan it in and use it as their avatar.

Ah, well, what's done is done. :(

The New Yorker seems not fully aware of the broader political context - ie not grasping that their satire will only fuel the misconceptions. And when you're making fun of people for being ignorant, that's kind of sad...

Edena_of_Neith
07-15-2008, 02:36 AM
I had always thought the New Yorker was a Democratic publication.
It would appear I was wrong.

Joke?
That's like joking about explosives, while you're in the international terminal building at an airport. (as the big red letters state, It Is No Laughing Matter.)

The Winslow
07-15-2008, 05:37 AM
Given how retarded most people are, they could have made this more obvious by having the "Terrorbamas" in a speech bubble coming from a pundit.