PDA

View Full Version : Photo Contest 4


Varaj
11-02-2007, 08:34 AM
Girl 1 vs Girl 2

Xavier Lang
11-02-2007, 09:28 AM
Both are nice....but I'm just not feeling one over the other. Maybe I will vote tomorrow.

Kwalish Kid
11-02-2007, 09:35 AM
OK. Now I'm getting a pedo vibe from Varaj here.

I think I'll refrain from voting.

Varaj
11-02-2007, 09:38 AM
OK. Now I'm getting a pedo vibe from Varaj here.

I think I'll refrain from voting.

If those photos make you think sexual you have many, many issues.

FeatsofClay
11-02-2007, 11:08 AM
Two GREAT photos, but the colors in the first make it a winner for me. :)

Atropine Mama
11-02-2007, 11:55 AM
OK. Now I'm getting a pedo vibe from Varaj here.

I think I'll refrain from voting.

Please tell me you're fucking joking, because if you are, then it will have just fallen flat and I'll think you have a worthless, unfunny sense of humor. If you're not, though, Varaj is right -- posting cute photos of toddlers in fields and on paths just being, well, cute little kids shouldn't make you think of sicko fantasies. Kwalish, please don't make me think you're any more of a stupid prick than I already do.

The Winslow
11-02-2007, 12:28 PM
The colored one is brighter and happier, the one in black and white looks a bit sad and maybe even sinister -- is this some fairy tale, is there a big bad wolf in that dark forest? -- but in the end, pic 2 is more moving, and more artsy so I went with it.

Brynja
11-02-2007, 12:32 PM
I like the first one it is hopeful and innocent.The second I disliked it seemed more sinister and she seems lost.

doc
11-02-2007, 02:25 PM
Ditto

Bagpuss
11-02-2007, 04:17 PM
Darn I voted for 1, on first impressions, but I think technically and story telling wise the 2nd is way better after taking a closer look. If you look at the second one the child seems to be in a really sinister place, that path leading off who knows where, autumn, it's cold and she's alone, but her duck is the only source of colour in the picture a real comfort. It's got a real Grimm fairytale feel to it.

Kwalish Kid
11-02-2007, 06:06 PM
Please tell me you're fucking joking, because if you are, then it will have just fallen flat and I'll think you have a worthless, unfunny sense of humor. If you're not, though, Varaj is right -- posting cute photos of toddlers in fields and on paths just being, well, cute little kids shouldn't make you think of sicko fantasies. Kwalish, please don't make me think you're any more of a stupid prick than I already do.
Fuck. You.

Vizzini
11-02-2007, 06:06 PM
First one. Forget the toddlers, that sunset is gorgeous

Vizzini
11-02-2007, 06:07 PM
Fuck. You.
I believe the appropriate response here is, "Inconceivable."

Varaj
11-02-2007, 07:42 PM
Fuck. You.

Thanks for taking message boards way too seriously.

I sense something here, there is a word for it...

I notice you turned off your karma. hmmmm

Atropine Mama
11-02-2007, 08:27 PM
Darn I voted for 1, on first impressions, but I think technically and story telling wise the 2nd is way better after taking a closer look. If you look at the second one the child seems to be in a really sinister place, that path leading off who knows where, autumn, it's cold and she's alone, but her duck is the only source of colour in the picture a real comfort. It's got a real Grimm fairytale feel to it.

Same here, voted 1 on color alone, but now I'm leaning towards two for the same reasons. It does tell more of a story, like she's off to have adventures with her Hobbes-like doll.

Fuck. You.

Not even with a borrowed strap-on. No thanks. :wanker:

I sense something here, there is a word for it...

I notice you turned off your karma. hmmmm

:killinme:

PWD
11-03-2007, 12:08 AM
Ignoring the fuckhole and getting back on topic, I'm digging on #2. Great photo.

Black Angel
11-04-2007, 05:11 AM
I like the first one it is hopeful and innocent.The second I disliked it seemed more sinister and she seems lost.

I'm with Brynja.

Kastil
11-05-2007, 11:51 PM
I like the first one. The position of little girl draws your attention into the center of the picture and the vibrant colors just glow.

I like the way the light plays on the other one but the detail of the leaves on the ground takes away from it.

Xavier Lang
11-06-2007, 08:59 AM
#2 for the duckie.


What!? Its an important detail. ;)

nerfherder
11-06-2007, 02:04 PM
I find #2 much more interesting. The tones, the shapes, the observer's position.

The colours on #1 look a bit too vivid and saturated for my taste. They scream out post-processing to me (even though it might have looked exactly like that).